According to documents obtained by the "veto" of which a copy has been obtained, the administrative prosecution announced the appointment in some administrative positions under the Civil Service Law before its abolition, taking into account that the executive regulations of this law require that the announcement be made through the Central Agency for Organization and Administration via the "portal E-government »provided that the advertisement is attached to the application form for the required jobs, meaning that the application is via the Internet without incurring any expenses. However, what was done by the administrative prosecution concerned with implementing the law was completely different, as a special printing press in the Ataba area was commissioned to print 750,000 seven hundred and fifty A thousand applications for appointment (one paper and an envelope) at a price of 45 piasters per application, and the envelope and paper "application" were sold for 25 pounds.
An amount of 18,750,000 pounds was collected as a result of the sale of these requests, and receipts were not issued to the buyers, although these requests were purchased from state funds at the beginning, and these funds were deposited in the treasury of the General Secretariat in violation of the law, as a receipt of 33 p. A buyer so that these sums can be directed to their correct path by calculating revenues in government accounts, but no one knows the fate of these huge sums that were collected with no control over their disbursements, and they are currently disbursing exorbitant rewards to some people without supervision!
The memorandum of Counselor Montasser Abdel-Al, for which he was transferred, on the same day that this memo, issued by the Department of Public Prosecutions, was sent for presentation to the head of the Administrative Prosecution Authority in accordance with Decision No. 75 of 2016 on February 25, in which it stated: “Your Excellency Resolution No. 55 of 2016 was issued to form several committees to conduct The exam decided for higher qualifications jobs, and given that the decision did not include clear and specific rules for the principles of evaluating the examiners and announcing them before the start of the exam so that they are aware of the basics of their evaluation, by setting grades for the qualification and another for the higher qualification “Masters and Ph.D.” and another for the oral examination, provided that it includes the statements of the examinees. Name, qualification, appreciation, higher qualification, and age as differentiation criteria, taking into account the placement of graduates of each qualification in specialized examination committees and their committees supported by one of the specialists in the field to facilitate the evaluation process with the work of special lists of the 5% because the method of their evaluation and appointment differs from others, all so that the competition is not subject An appeal before the judiciary, as happened in previous competitions, with kindly directing the heads of the committees to submit certified statements of exam scores at the end of each day so that the prosecution department can The measures required to be appointed and presented to your Excellency so that things go on their right track and that the administrative prosecution remain trusted by everyone and all state institutions, and to fulfill its mission in implementing the law, fighting corruption, and working on administrative reform of state agencies.
The former Director of the Department of Public Prosecutions concluded a request to create an independent competition for 500 jobs that the Minister of Finance agreed to finance and not be integrated into the current competition, so he was removed from the Department of Prosecutions and transferred outside it as a punishment for him, and of course he did not pay attention to it.
In the end, the decision of appointments in those positions which amounted to 2335 jobs was announced, although the Minister of Finance approved 1500 only, according to the letter issued by him to the head of the authority, where the two sons of the second wife of the advisor Sameh Muhammad Kamal, head of the Administrative Prosecution Authority, Mrs. (Wafaa Abdel Aziz Muhammad) were appointed Hassan) is his office manager, the first of which is (Sameh Mustafa Al-Sayed), No. 123 in the position of an Administrative Development Researcher, and of course they concealed the last name “prestige” with the intent to deceive and his sister (Hadeer Mustafa al-Sayed Heiba) No. 212 in the same disclosure !! In addition to appointing others, including her son’s wife and people who did not They are applying to join these jobs from the ground up. The sons of the private driver, the wife of the head of the Commission, have been appointed to the position of a fourth writer, and they are Ahmed Tariq Al Mahdi and Aya Tariq Abdul Hadi. Of course, they concealed the name “Abdul Hadi” from the first and the name of “Al Mahdi” from his sister intentionally with the intention of camouflaging and all This is in addition to the appointment of brothers and spouses in that competition, in violation of the constitution and all laws.
The "veto" also obtained a second memorandum from former Finance Minister Hani Qadri addressed to Counselor Sameh Kamal, head of the Administrative Prosecution Authority, on February 4, last year, approving the financing of another 500 job ranks on condition that it be announced according to the circular issued by the Presidency of the Council of Ministers No. 2 of 5 January 2016, which is directed to all ministers, and it has not been implemented, as these degrees were combined with what was included in the first approval with 335 vacancies in violation of all laws.
On the other hand, a document issued by the General Secretariat of the Supreme Council of Administrative Prosecution revealed that Hadeer Mustafa Al-Sayed Heiba, who obtained a Bachelor of Laws from Ain Shams University in 2012, and who was recently appointed to the position of a researcher for administrative development, applied for a technical position and she is an assistant on the administrative prosecution. The date of Saturday, March 12, last at one o'clock in the afternoon, the Fourth Committee with serial number 5, and surprisingly, she passed the interview even though she has a Bachelor of Laws with a percentage of 65 % only, and her father does not hold a high qualification, and at the same time others have failed despite having a very good rating!
"Quoting on the paper issue .."
Short link: https://pfort.org/en/?p=1182
