Paper documents showed that one of the defendants in the case of wheat corruption violations known as the “wheat corruption” case, that the accused imprisoned and with custody of his money called Muhammad Ali Abdullah Ragab worked in charge of importing and storing the General Company for Silos and Storage, before the Parliamentary Truth Commission asked him to delegate him from The company on July 26.

The documents, which Al-Watan obtained, contained a letter addressed by the Secretary-General of the House of Representatives Counselor Ahmed Saad Eddin and addressed to Major General Ali Azzam, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the General Company for Silos and Storage on July 26, until the fact-finding committee formed by the House of Representatives to study corruption in The supplies of wheat and the waste of public money for the benefit of wheat importers wish to seek the assistance of the efforts of Mr. Muhammad Ali Abdullah, the import and storage specialist of the company, to benefit from his experiences in what falls within the competence of the committee from July 17, 2016 until the committee finishes its work, and we hope to agree to assign the aforementioned Mr. this task.

The General Company for Silos and Storage received the Parliament with a letter signed by the Chairman and Managing Director, and the text of the letter read as follows: “Mr. Counselor Ahmed Saad Eddin, Secretary-General of Parliament in response to your letter No. 233 in the use of the efforts of Mr. Muhammad Ali Abdullah, the import and storage specialist of the company, to benefit from his experience in the matter. It falls within the competence of the commission. I have the honor to attach to your Excellency a copy of Resolution No. 164 of July 26, 2016, to assign Mr. Muhammad Ali Abdullah to work with the fact-finding commission until the completion of its work. ”

The company issued its Decision No. 164 of 2016, which indicated that after reviewing the 2013 Law of 1991 to issue the Public Business Sector Companies Law and its implementing regulations, the company's employee system bylaw, and the Secretary General's letter to the House of Representatives, first article: assigning Mr. Muhammad Ali Abdullah Rajab No. 6375 A third-class import specialist in the commercial sector to work with the fact-finding committee formed in the House of Representatives to study corruption in wheat supplies and waste public money for the benefit of wheat importers until the committee finishes its work, and a second article: The competent authorities must implement this decision each in its own right.

The documents indicated that the storage and import official in the company who was assigned to work with the fact-finding committee received a notification on August 6, 8 days after the decision was issued to delegate him to the fact-finding committee to appear before the criminal court in its session on the next day to consider an order preventing him from disposing of his money in accordance with the decision of the prosecution. Supreme Public Fund No. 32 of 2016.

The silos company official stated, in an official letter to the prosecution, that he was not aware of the investigations being conducted by the Public Prosecutor in the aforementioned case, and he was not investigated.

The documents indicated that, after only two days, the official of the silos company assigned to work with the fact-finding committee received a phone call from the Administrative Control, summoning him to come to the headquarters of the Administrative Control, and that when he went there, he was arrested and presented to the Public Prosecution on the next day, which decided to imprison him for fifteen days. Pending investigations, the accused was presented to the court the day before yesterday to consider renewing his detention, and the court decided to renew his detention for a period of 45 days.

The documents contained, a copy of which, that the defendant’s defense submitted to the Supreme Public Funds Prosecution a grievance and a petition, in which he said that the accused was the one who exposed corruption in the wheat system through what was discovered to him of corruption in the past years and informed the competent authorities to uncover the system of corruption which recommended his appointment as one of the Members of committees specialized in receiving and detecting corruption and that the accused was in constant contact with the regulatory authorities periodically and regularly and appointed them to detect corruption and this is fixed by receipts issued by him and received from the concerned agencies, which is the matter that prompted the regulatory authorities to nominate him as a member of the fact-finding committee formed in the House of Representatives to study corruption and stand on How it happened.

The defendant’s defense requested a question by the fact-finding committee and the oversight agencies, with which he was working, and to issue a decision to release him, as he was a prosecution witness and not an accused.

It is noteworthy that the Supreme Public Funds Prosecution starts the work of the fact-finding committee formed by Parliament to prepare a report on corruption operations related to the operations of supplying wheat to silos and Shawn.