“Shukr”: The presidential institution must intervene to solve the crisis

“Saeed Abdel-Hafez”: The solution is through dialogue, not “red eye”

Walaa Jad Al-Karim: The crisis is like a battle of “breaking bones,” and an impartial committee must be formed to solve it

Since the outbreak of the current crisis between the Ministry of the Interior and the Syndicate of Journalists, the situation is getting worse day by day, and worsening to a severe degree for everyone, until everyone no longer knows where this crisis will reach us and when it will be resolved.

The first obstacle in the way of the solution is that both parties refuse to compromise, but rather move towards escalation, which leads us to more confrontation and conflict between two of the major state institutions.

As for the most dangerous thing in the crisis, it is the exploitation of external parties and predators and portraying the matter as a conflict and hostility between the internal state institutions, as the Washington Post described the matter that the interior is against freedom of opinion and creativity and that the interior is besieging the Syndicate of Journalists, how John Kerry commented that the matter calls for intervention to protect human rights and freedom The opinion.

As a result of the dangerous situations, whose extent we do not know, everyone must search for solutions and present innovative proposals that would solve the crisis and help stabilize the situation.

“Shukr”: The presidential institution must intervene to solve the crisis

Dr. Abdel Ghaffar Shukr, Vice President of the National Council for Human Rights, stressed the need for political harmony between the two parties to the conflict, represented by the Ministry of Interior and the Syndicate of Journalists, in order to get out of the current crisis, which is worsening day by day.

 "Shukr" added in a special statement to "Citizen's Rights" that there are always compromises, but they require the intervention of a large and strong political party to propose, present and implement these solutions, calling on the Presidency to decisively and decisively intervene between the two parties to get out of the crisis and solve it in ways commensurate with the status of the two institutions.

The Vice-President of the National Council for Human Rights stated that each of the two parties is moving alone in the direction of escalation of the crisis and not in directions to solve it, which made it necessary for major political forces to intervene to solve the crisis and provide compromise solutions that satisfy everyone.

He pointed out that the council has formed a fact-finding committee to research and study the current crisis between the Ministry of Interior and the Syndicate of Journalists, and to find out its circumstances, consequences and developments in events, and in light of these perceptions resulting from the committee’s research, the council will take its decision and present proposals for solutions to the crisis.

He continued: The Human Rights Committee in the House of Representatives has also formed a committee to investigate similar facts, as part of its endeavor to present proposals for solutions to the current crisis and submit them to Parliament for study and resolve the entanglement between the two parties.

“Saeed Abdel-Hafez”: The solution is through dialogue, not “red eye”

The human rights expert, Saeed Abdel-Hafez, director of the Dialogue Forum for Development and Human Rights, emphasized that the origin of the issue is a crisis between the Syndicate of Journalists and the Ministry of Interior and not between the Syndicate and the state, as some want to portray this, and at the beginning of the road to a solution we must start from the ground that it is an emergency crisis between the Syndicate of Journalists and someone State institutions.

"Abdel-Hafez" added in a special statement to "Citizen's Rights" that it is wrong to imagine that the Ministry of Interior can dispense with journalists or that journalists dispense with the Ministry of Interior with all its facilities, stressing that trying to portray the matter as hostility between the two parties will harm both parties.

The human rights expert explained that the solution is dialogue that seeks a solution, not by mobilizing each team for its weapons, using maneuver and reddening the eye from each team to the other, and a neutral team that enjoys the confidence of both parties can manage this initiative that seeks to solve the crisis.

He continued: Many questions must be answered in order to reach a solution that satisfies the two parties, namely, “Who manages the dialogue, what are the foundations of the dialogue, what are the desired goals of the dialogue, what are the concessions acceptable to both parties that the dialogue seeks”.

Walaa Jad Al-Karim: The crisis is like a battle of “breaking bones,” and an impartial committee must be formed to solve it

Dr. Walaa Gad Al-Karim, Director of Partners for Transparency, confirmed that there is a dangerous escalation on the part of the Ministry of the Interior and the Syndicate of Journalists, especially the left-wing members of the Syndicate, which has no need and no justification at all at this critical time for everyone, pointing out that the loser in the end is a profession the press.

 "Jad Al-Karim" added, in a special statement to "Citizen's Right," that the conflict and confrontation between the Ministry of Interior and the Syndicate of Journalists is like an unnecessary bone-breaking battle, stressing that the President of the Republic will not dismiss the Minister of Interior due to the Syndicate's pressure.

 The human rights expert explained that the solution to the crisis is the formation of a fact-finding committee consisting of “Chairman of the Information Committee, Chairman of Parliament's Human Rights Committee, one of the sheikhs of the journalism profession nominated by the Syndicate’s Board of Directors, a judge nominated by the Supreme Judicial Council, and a member of the National Council for Human Rights.”

"Jad Al-Karim" added that the committee, when carrying out its work, must take into account Article 70 of the Journalists Syndicate Law, as well as the Penal Code, and that the committee's first goal should be to clarify whether the police entered the Journalists Syndicate within a legal framework or against the law.

And the human rights expert continued, that the committee announces what it has reached to the public opinion and submits its report to the Presidency and the House of Representatives. If the police’s entry is in a coalition, punitive measures are taken against the Minister of Interior and officials, but if it is not in violation, the blame is directed to the Journalists Syndicate and resolute measures are taken with it. Causing the crisis and exacerbating it. Citizen's right