{"id":2368,"date":"2017-06-17T11:25:13","date_gmt":"2017-06-17T11:25:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/?p=2368"},"modified":"2017-07-13T11:31:04","modified_gmt":"2017-07-13T11:31:04","slug":"%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a7%d8%a1-%d9%85%d9%86-%d8%a3%d8%ac%d9%84-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b4%d9%81%d8%a7%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%a9-75-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%82%d8%b9%d8%a9-%d9%81%d8%b3%d8%a7%d8%af-%d8%ae%d9%84%d8%a7%d9%84","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a7%d8%a1-%d9%85%d9%86-%d8%a3%d8%ac%d9%84-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b4%d9%81%d8%a7%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%a9-75-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%82%d8%b9%d8%a9-%d9%81%d8%b3%d8%a7%d8%af-%d8%ae%d9%84%d8%a7%d9%84\/","title":{"rendered":"Partners for Transparency: 75 incidents of corruption during May 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

Motherland<\/p>\n

Saturday 17 June 2017<\/p>\n

Hoda Rashwan wrote<\/p>\n

Partners for Transparency issued the 23rd report of the Corruption Status Book series, which dealt with monitoring and analysis of legislative and procedural developments related to combating corruption, as well as listing the facts that were uncovered during May 2017 and classifying them by sector, geography and judiciary.<\/p>\n

The report monitored the supervisory performance of the House of Representatives this month, as it submitted a number of requests for information related to incidents of corruption and waste of public money, while the legislative role is still completely absent in this regard, and the month of May 2017 witnessed the signing of a cooperation protocol between administrative control and the World Bank in the field of strengthening governance. .<\/p>\n

Monitoring data in May indicated that the local sector came in first place among corruption incidents, with 15 incidents, while the Ministry of Supply came in second place with 13 corruption incidents, followed by the Ministry of Health with 11 incidents, then the Ministry of Education with 5 incidents, then the Interior With 4 incidents, then the Ministry of Finance, Housing and Endowments, with 3 incidents of corruption.<\/p>\n

On the judicial level, he indicated that the incidents under investigation still came first among the corruption incidents during the month of May 2017, as the largest percentage was recorded at 64% out of a total of 75 incidents, followed by the incidents that were registered for trial with a score of 20%, then the incidents that were judged by 9% For example, the facts for which it was not investigated ranked last with a score of 7%.<\/p>\n

The report stated: \u201cCairo governorate acquired the largest share of corruption incidents during the month of May 2017, as it obtained 22 corruption incidents during May 2017, followed by Giza Governorate with a score of 13 corruption incidents, then Qaliubiya Governorate with a score of 10 incidents, followed by Alexandria Governorate with a score 8 facts.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Al-Watan Saturday, June 17, 2017 Written by Hoda Rashwan The \u201cPartners for Transparency\u201d Foundation issued the 23rd report of the Corruption Casebook series of reports, which dealt with monitoring and analysis of legislative and procedural developments related to the fight against corruption, as well as an inventory of the facts that were revealed during the month of May 2017 and their sectoral classification. Geographically and judicially. The report monitored the oversight performance of this House of Representatives...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2369,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,13],"tags":[79,23],"yst_prominent_words":[],"class_list":["post-2368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-issue","category-websites","tag-79","tag-23"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2368"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2368\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2369"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2368"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=2368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}