{"id":2068,"date":"2017-02-18T12:43:06","date_gmt":"2017-02-18T12:43:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/?p=2068"},"modified":"2017-03-14T12:51:04","modified_gmt":"2017-03-14T12:51:04","slug":"%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%82%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%b1-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d8%a7%d8%b3%d8%b9-%d8%b9%d8%b4%d8%b1-%d9%8a%d9%86%d8%a7%d9%8a%d8%b1-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%82%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%b1-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d8%a7%d8%b3%d8%b9-%d8%b9%d8%b4%d8%b1-%d9%8a%d9%86%d8%a7%d9%8a%d8%b1-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"The Nineteenth Report \u201cJanuary 2017\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Corruption Status Book<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>The Nineteenth Report \u201cJanuary 2017\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 66 incidents of corruption and officials&#039; statements were not translated further<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Within the framework of the \u201cCorruption Status Book\u201d series, \u201cPartners for Transparency\u201d PFT issued the nineteenth report, which included monitoring and analysis of corruption incidents in the month of January 2017. .<\/p>\n<p>While there has been no change in the legislative or institutional environment related to combating corruption, and the month has only witnessed repeated statements here and there by a number of officials, all of them talking about fighting corruption, without translating these statements further.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of facts, the Ministry of Supply still ranks first among corruption incidents with a score of 16, followed by the local sector with 11 incidents of corruption, then each of the Ministry of Education, Agriculture and Health comes with 6 incidents for each of them, then comes the Ministry of Information, Endowments and Electricity A score of two events for each of them.<\/p>\n<p>As for the judicial position, the report revealed that the incidents under investigation still ranked first among corruption incidents during the month of January 2017, where the largest percentage was recorded at 76%, followed by the incidents under trial with 23% of the total incidents, then the incidents that were judged last. By 1 %.<\/p>\n<p>As for the geographical distribution, Cairo governorate still accounts for the largest share of corruption incidents, as it witnessed 21 incidents of corruption, followed by Qalyubia governorate with 6 incidents, followed by Giza and Eastern governorates with 5 incidents for each of them, while Beheira, Menoufia, Gharbia, New Valley and Assiut each witnessed 3 incidents for each. Of which .<\/p>\n<p>To view the full report: <a href=\"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/66%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%82%d8%b9%d8%a9-%d9%81%d8%b3%d8%a7%d8%af-%d9%88%d8%aa%d8%b5%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%ad%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d8%b3%d8%a6%d9%88%d9%84%d9%8a%d9%86-%d9%84%d9%85-%d8%aa%d8%aa%d8%b1%d8%ac\/\">https:\/\/pfort.org\/?p=2018<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Corruption Casebook, the nineteenth report, \u201cJanuary 2017.\u201d 66 incidents of corruption and officials\u2019 statements were not translated further. Within the framework of the \u201cCorruption Casebook\u201d series, \u201cPartners for Transparency\u201d PFT issued the nineteenth report, which included monitoring and analyzing corruption incidents in January 2017. The institution monitored 66 corruption incidents...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2022,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[461,463,202,200,464],"class_list":["post-2068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-66-","tag-463","tag-202","tag-200","tag-464"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2068"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2068\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}