{"id":1547,"date":"2016-08-14T10:43:42","date_gmt":"2016-08-14T10:43:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/?p=1547"},"modified":"2026-05-19T14:22:42","modified_gmt":"2026-05-19T11:22:42","slug":"%d8%a7%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%b2%d9%87%d9%85-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d9%85%d8%ad-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%88%d9%87%d9%85%d9%8964-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%82%d8%b9%d8%a9-%d9%81%d8%b3%d8%a7%d8%af-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d9%8a%d9%88%d9%84","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/%d8%a7%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%b2%d9%87%d9%85-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d9%85%d8%ad-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%88%d9%87%d9%85%d9%8964-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%82%d8%b9%d8%a9-%d9%81%d8%b3%d8%a7%d8%af-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d9%8a%d9%88%d9%84\/","title":{"rendered":"The most prominent of them is \u201cfake wheat\u201d 64 corruption incidents in July 2016 ...!"},"content":{"rendered":"

experimental<\/h4>\n

Posted on with 0 comment<\/span> Added on: 08\/14\/2016 at: <\/span><\/h4>\n

1:26:31<\/span><\/h4>\n

<\/h4>\n

Muhammad Mustafa report<\/strong><\/p>\n

Within the framework of the \u201cCorruption Status Book\u201d series, the PFT has been released<\/strong> The thirteenth report, which included monitoring and analyzing incidents of corruption in July 2016, as the institution monitored 64 incidents of corruption during the month, which are the facts that were revealed through the investigation authorities, Parliament and various media.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The month of July witnessed the discovery of the largest case of corruption in wheat silos, represented in a fake recording of the quantities of wheat in silos, which represented a waste of public money, which prompted Parliament to form a fact-finding committee to uncover corruption in wheat silos, where the committee made several visits and the committee explained that the amount of money wasted during only nine visits is estimated With 600 million pounds until the end of July, and confirmed that it will issue a final report on the wasted money, which prompted the prosecution to summon approximately 36 people, including a senior official at the Ministry of Supply and a businessman, to be involved in this case, and the month also witnessed statements by some MPs about local corruption.<\/strong><\/p>\n

At the level of facts, the Ministry of Supply achieved the largest share of corruption incidents during the month of July 2016 with a score of 15 corruption incidents out of a total of 64 incidents, followed by the Ministry of Agriculture with a score of 10 incidents of corruption, followed by the local sector with 9 incidents, followed by the health sector with 8 incidents of corruption. Each of the Ministry of Electricity and Justice has 3 incidents for each.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As for the judicial position, the report revealed that the incidents under investigation came first among corruption incidents during the month of July 2016, as the largest percentage was recorded at 66 % out of a total of 64 incidents, followed by the incidents under trial with 11 %, then the facts that were not investigated came with a score. 17 %, the judged incidents ranked last with a 6% total of incidents.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As for geographical distribution, Cairo governorate still occupies the largest share of corruption incidents during the month of July 2016 due to the concentration of administrative headquarters in it, where it received 23 corruption incidents, followed by Sharkia governorate with 5 incidents of corruption, followed by Minya and Sohag governorates with 4 incidents for each of them.<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Experimental Published in with 0 comments Added on: 08\/14\/2016 at: 1:26:31 Report by Muhammad Mustafa Within the framework of the \u201cCorruption Casebook\u201d series, \u201cPartners for Transparency\u201d PFT issued the thirteenth report, which included monitoring and analyzing incidents of corruption. In July 2016, the Foundation monitored 64 corruption incidents during the month,\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1548,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[334,336,339,23,337],"class_list":["post-1547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reverberate","tag-64--","tag-336","tag-339","tag-23","tag-337"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1547"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1547\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6524,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1547\/revisions\/6524"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pfort.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}